Revcore
SystemIndustriesServicesWorkGrow with AI
SoftwareCheck your market
Lead
Qualified
Booked
Shown
Sold
Revcore

A growth firm for home improvement contractors. One contractor per trade, per market.

(480) 908-5600hayden@revcorehq.com
Explore
  • System
  • Services
  • Industries
  • Work
Understand
  • Pay per appointment
  • Grow with AI
  • AEO
  • Insights
Company
  • About
  • Method
  • Markets
  • Contact
Software
  • RevCore Pro
  • Product tour
  • Start free trial
  • Log in
Ask about us on

Opens a new tab with a starter question. Citation-ready facts: llms.txt.

ChatGPTClaudePerplexityGeminiCopilot
© 2026 RevCore HQPrivacyTerms
Phoenix, AZ

Shared leads aren't a channel. They're a tax on your margin.

A shared lead costs $42. Sounds cheap until you read the fine print: the same homeowner got sold to three of your competitors at $42 a pop. You didn't buy a customer. You bought an entry fee to a race.

The race starts the second the lead drops. Four contractors dial one phone. The homeowner answers once, maybe. Whoever gets through first wins the right to give a quote that gets shopped against three others.

Now run the margin math. Four bidders on one project means somebody buys the job. Price becomes the only lever, and price is your margin. The lead was $42. The discount it took to win was the real bill.

The homeowner isn't having fun either. Five calls in ten minutes reads like desperation, not service. By the third pitch they trust nobody and take the cheapest number just to end it. Shared leads train your own market to price-shop you.

Add it up and shared leads aren't a channel. They're a tax on every job you win and every job you lose. You pay it in ad dollars, in discounts, and in a market that treats your trade like a commodity.

The other way is owning your demand. We run one contractor per trade, per market. When your territory's locked, it's locked, and every homeowner we generate hears one name: yours.

You don't buy leads at all. You pay for qualified appointments, booked on your calendar, with a homeowner who asked for you. No race, no bidding war, a quote presented at full margin.

You can keep paying the tax, or you can own the market. The spend is comparable. Only one of them compounds.

Straight answers

What's the difference between shared leads and exclusive leads?

A shared lead is sold to several contractors at once, so you're buying an entry fee to a race rather than a customer. An exclusive lead goes to one company. The price difference looks large until you count the discount it takes to win a four-way bid, which is where the real cost sits.

Are lead marketplaces like Angi or Thumbtack worth it for contractors?

They can fill a slow week, and that has value. What they can't do is build anything: you rent access to homeowners who are simultaneously being pitched by your competitors, on a platform that owns the relationship. Treat it as overflow capacity, not as a growth channel.

Why do shared leads hurt margin so much?

Because four bidders on one project means somebody buys the job, and price becomes the only lever anyone has left. The lead was cheap. The discount it took to win it wasn't, and it comes out of the same margin that pays your crew.

What should I buy instead of leads?

Qualified appointments on your own calendar, from demand generated in your name. There's no race, no bidding war, and the quote gets presented at full margin. That's the model we run: you pay per qualified appointment that shows, and media is on us.

Does exclusivity actually matter in a big metro?

More than in a small one, because a large metro is where a marketing company is most tempted to sign three contractors in the same trade and let them compete over the same homeowners. We run one contractor per trade, per market, which is the only version of this that's honest with anyone.

Next step

Book a strategy call